Gardi, Haught, Fischer & Bhosale LTD.

The Res Ipsa Loquitur Law for Personal Injury Cases

By Gardi, Haught, Fischer & Bhosale LTD
February 20, 2014

In some personal injury cases, plaintiffs can invoke the law of “res ipsa loquitur” (which in Latin means “the thing speaks for itself”) to prove that the accident would not have happened unless the defendant had been negligent.  For example, if a surgeon operates on the wrong body part, or leaves a surgical tool or sponge inside of a patient, a plaintiff can use the law to prove that the accident would not have occurred without negligence on the doctor’s part.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is a special consideration granted to plaintiffs who are injured because of negligence.  It permits proof of negligence by circumstantial evidence when the direct evidence concerning the cause of the injury is known and controlled by the defendant.

In the past, evoking res ipsa loquitur required the plaintiff to prove that the injury was not a result of an act or omission on their part.  However, because of Supreme Court decisions and the adoption of comparative negligence (which we will review in a later article) this is no longer required. Now, in order to invoke the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the injured party must establish two elements:

1) The injury would not have occurred under usual circumstances; (an absence of negligence) and;

2) The instrumentality or agency causing the accident was under the management or control of the defendant.

The Illinois Supreme Court now recognizes that “exclusive control” is not necessary when invoking the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. The plaintiff must simply establish that the instrumentality which caused the injury was in the control of the defendant at the time of the negligence and there were no changes in conditions or other intervening acts that could reasonably have caused the injurious event. Once this is established, the plaintiff can show the accident was the result of the defendant’s negligence and would not have occurred otherwise.

A plaintiff is not required to eliminate all other potential causes of the injury conclusively.  They need only present sufficient evidence to convince a jury that the injury was, more probably than not, the result of the defendant’s actions, not someone else’s.

If you have suffered an injury, of any type, the law firm of Gardi, Haught, Fischer & Bhosale, Ltd., will put the law to work for you and fight to get you the compensation you deserve.  Request A Case Evaluation below.

Request A Case Evaluation

 

Request a Consultation

heading-bottom-graphic

related articles:

heading-bottom-graphic
Category

Client Testimonials

heading-bottom-graphic
I worked with Ann Fischer, not once but twice for my family's immigration visa needs. Both the experiences were immaculate. For those who may want services, I would encourage you if you are in need of the best in class, hasslefree and quality services.I could not have asked for anything better.Thank You Ann Fischer (Gardi, Haught, Fischer, & Bhosale LTD). You were fantastic on both the immigrant visa applications (2021-2023) & (2023-2025).When I started the search, I narrowed down between three immigration attorneys and I am glad I crossed path with the best in their domain.Below is how my experience was in each bracketQuality of Service * * * * * (5/5)Responsiveness * * * * * (5/5)Approachable * * * * * (5/5)Explanation * * * * * (5/5)Timeliness * * * * * (5/5)Consultative * * * * * (5/5)Peace of Mind * * * * * (5/5)I will definitely recommend anyone, looking for their immigration needs.
Gardi, Haught, Fischer & Bhosale represented us in a recent R/E closing. Everything went very smoothly between the back office & the other parties. We were informed & the whole process was made simple. I would recommend this firm for all your R/E transactions. 10 out of 10.
Took the time to answer my questions
Our team partnered with Gardi, Haught, Fischer, & Bhosale LTD. on a recent transaction, and we appreciated their dedication and professional approach to closing the deal. We’re looking forward to more successful collaborations ahead
We just had great experience with Tom Haught and his paralegal Courtney Kropf. The communication is clear and fast. All emails were replied within 30 minutes. We will definitely work with Tom Haught again.
Was recommended to them from my company. They did an excellent job and always answered all my questions. Were always upfront with all things and made sure I understood everything that was explained to me.
We used the law firm during the sale of our house. We dealt with Mr Haught and Courtney, who made the process very smooth. They were professional, yet very friendly to deal with.I would not hesitate to recommend them to my family and friends.
We have used Tom Haught for two home purchases and one sale over the years and continue to be impressed by his professionalism, responsiveness, and thoroughness. Reasonable pricing too. Highly, highly recommended.
js_loader