Gardi, Haught, Fischer & Bhosale LTD.

Illinois Provides Sexual Harassment Protection for Unpaid Interns

By Gardi, Haught, Fischer & Bhosale LTD
June 5, 2015

Illinois is one of the few states in the country who protect unpaid interns from sexual harassment. According to Joseph Olivares, Commission Spokesperson for the U.S. Equal Opportunities Commission, unpaid interns are not protected under federal law since they are not considered employees. Therefore, they are not afforded the protections provided by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

A number of national media cases have called attention to this injustice. Many federal cases of young interns who were the alleged target of relatively egregious sexual misconduct by supervisors have had their cases thrown out because they were simply not protected by federal or state law due to their intern status.
In January, Illinois decided to protect interns from sexual harassment by broadening workplace sexual harassment protections and redefining what it means to be an “employee” in the state’s Human Rights Act (HRA) as it relates to sexual harassment.

Request A Case Evaluation

So what constitutes an intern? The HRA defines an “unpaid intern as a person who (1) performs work for an employer when the employer is not committed to hiring the person at the conclusion of the internship; and (2) both intern and employer agree that the intern is not entitled to wages for work performed. Additionally, (1) the work performed must supplement the intern’s education in a way that enhances the intern’s employability; (2) the work must provide experience for the benefit of the intern; (3) the intern cannot displace regular employees; (4) the work must be performed under close supervision by staff; and (5) the work cannot provide any immediate advantage to the employer and may, in fact, at times impede operations.”

What Employers Need to Know

In Illinois, it is important for an employer to know that their level of responsibility for the sexual harassment varies depending on whether the sexual misconduct was the action of a supervisory employee or a non-supervisory employee.

If the harassment took place by a non-supervisory employee, an employer is liable for the sexual harassment only if they had been made aware of the sexual misconduct and then failed to take corrective measures. For supervisory employees, an employer is held strictly liable for the sexual misconduct of its managers and supervisors. In other words, regardless of whether the employer knows about the sexual misconduct, the employer is always held liable.

Illinois case law has defined a “supervisory employee” as “an individual having [who has the] authority to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, discipline, and handle grievances of other employees, by exercising independent judgment.” The law extends strict liability to all supervisory employees, regardless of whether the supervisor has the ability to exercise control over a subordinate employee or not.

While an employer should always be vigilant in facilitating a safe and secure work environment, it’s important to know the level of knowledge the law will impose when imputing sexual harassment to employers.

If you have questions regarding your responsibilities regarding interns and sexual harassment, please request a case evaluation below.

Request A Case Evaluation
_________________________
775 ILCS 5/2-101(A)).
Id.
Bd. of Directors, Green Hills Country Club v. Illinois Human Rights Comm’n, 162 Ill. App. 3d 216, 219, 514 N.E.2d 1227, 1229 (1987)
Id.
. Sangamon Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t v. State Human Rights Comm’n, 375 Ill. App. 3d 834, 847, 875 N.E.2d 10, 20 (2007) rev’d sub nom. Sangamon Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t v. Illinois Human Rights Comm’n, 233 Ill. 2d 125, 908 N.E.2d 39 (2009)
Sangamon Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t v. Illinois Human Rights Comm’n, 233 Ill. 2d 125, 144, 908 N.E.2d 39, 49 (2009)

Request a Consultation

heading-bottom-graphic

related articles:

heading-bottom-graphic
Category

Client Testimonials

heading-bottom-graphic
Our team partnered with Gardi, Haught, Fischer, & Bhosale LTD. on a recent transaction, and we appreciated their dedication and professional approach to closing the deal. We’re looking forward to more successful collaborations ahead
We just had great experience with Tom Haught and his paralegal Courtney Kropf. The communication is clear and fast. All emails were replied within 30 minutes. We will definitely work with Tom Haught again.
Was recommended to them from my company. They did an excellent job and always answered all my questions. Were always upfront with all things and made sure I understood everything that was explained to me.
We used the law firm during the sale of our house. We dealt with Mr Haught and Courtney, who made the process very smooth. They were professional, yet very friendly to deal with.I would not hesitate to recommend them to my family and friends.
We have used Tom Haught for two home purchases and one sale over the years and continue to be impressed by his professionalism, responsiveness, and thoroughness. Reasonable pricing too. Highly, highly recommended.
Gardi, Haught is one of professional firm, I have been with G&H since last 8 years in all legal matters.RegardsWaseem Chaudhry
We worked with Tom and Courtney mainly on our recent closing. While it did not go as planned (all the other side’s issues) they did a great job keeping us informed and in track. Highly recommend.
Aaron Novasic was fantastic in handling my case. He stayed in touch, told me what was going on and what to expect, and most importantly he fought for me the entire way. Couldn't be happier having him represent me.
js_loader