Gardi, Haught, Fischer & Bhosale LTD.

Last November, President Obama issued an executive order to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security that would provide protection for up to 5 million undocumented immigrants by expanding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to include additional immigrants. The new program, entitled Deferred Action for Parents of Americans or Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) provides qualifying immigrants protection from removal from the United States. Qualifying applicants are individuals who have U.S. citizen children, and have been present in the United States since January 1, 2015. The protective status does not grant residency or citizenship, but rather it protects the individual from deportation for a period or three years rather than two, as was the time period under the DACA program. Individuals that qualify under DACA or DAPA are granted work authorization and can obtain a driver’s license in the state where they reside. United State Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) was to begin processing these applications on February 18, 2015.

Texas Governor Gregg Abbott, along with 26 other states, filed suit alleging that implementation of the program would cause the State of Texas irreparable harm due to the cost of issuing drivers licenses to the qualified immigrants under DACA and DAPA. On February 16, 2015, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen issued a preliminary injunction that prevented the implementation of the new program while he reviewed the merits of the case. The issue on review is the legality of Obama’s order, coming from the Executive Branch. The Plaintiff’s position is that while the Department of Homeland Security has the right to allocate their funds and exercise their right to deport undocumented immigrants as they choose, they are not permitted to create a protected status of individuals. They argue that Congress alone has the right to create immigrants’ statuses.

The matter was heard again before Judge Hanen on March 19, 2015. Judge Hanen suggested that he could order sanctions against the Justice Department if the administration of the order had begun prematurely. The Department of Justice was asked to explain 108,081 reprieves that were not stopped by the injunction but issued under the 2012 laws. Hanen has yet to make the ruling and USCIS is not accepting applications for the expanded DACA or DAPA programs until the ruling is made.

While Illinois is participating in the suit, other Plaintiff’s include representatives Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

Client Testimonials

heading-bottom-graphic
We just had great experience with Tom Haught and his paralegal Courtney Kropf. The communication is clear and fast. All emails were replied within 30 minutes. We will definitely work with Tom Haught again.
Was recommended to them from my company. They did an excellent job and always answered all my questions. Were always upfront with all things and made sure I understood everything that was explained to me.
We used the law firm during the sale of our house. We dealt with Mr Haught and Courtney, who made the process very smooth. They were professional, yet very friendly to deal with.I would not hesitate to recommend them to my family and friends.
Our immigration experience with Ann Fischer has been amazing! She has been meticulous, organized and worked on our case in a timely manner. Ann and her team went above and beyond to address all of our concerns and provide a personalized support which made a significant difference during our stressful time.I highly recommend her services to anyone seeking legal representation for their immigration matters.
We have used Tom Haught for two home purchases and one sale over the years and continue to be impressed by his professionalism, responsiveness, and thoroughness. Reasonable pricing too. Highly, highly recommended.
Gardi, Haught is one of professional firm, I have been with G&H since last 8 years in all legal matters.RegardsWaseem Chaudhry
Tom and his dedicated crew recently helped me close on a commercial property, and I must say they did an exceptional job! Throughout the entire process, they were incredibly responsive, attentive to detail, and a pleasure to work with. Their professionalism and expertise made the transaction smooth and efficient. I am thoroughly impressed with their performance and definitely plan to work with them again in the near future. I highly recommend Tom and his team for anyone in need of real estate services!
I'd like to thank Gardi, Haught, Fischer, & Bhosale LTD and the whole Team! For amazing service. They made my selling experience fast, easy and at my convenience. I'm very thankful for the whole team over there. Their service meant alot to me and will be using them in the future. 10/10 !
We worked with Tom and Courtney mainly on our recent closing. While it did not go as planned (all the other side’s issues) they did a great job keeping us informed and in track. Highly recommend.
js_loader

Request a Consultation

heading-bottom-graphic

related articles:

heading-bottom-graphic
Category